Ok, I wrote most of this up as part of an old email to my girlfriend a few months ago. I figure it's a decent bit of writing, and wanted to make it public to receive some criticism. I've reworked it a bit since the audience has changed, and cleaned up some digressions.
Thoughts?
Note: upon rereading this, when I refer to "war" I realized I picture the trenches of WWI or the protracted battles of WWII more than the current goings-on in Iraq, for example, but perhaps my opinions apply to it all.
---
May 23, 2008
Military funerals and war veteran graveyards and memorials seem to be among the few things that can almost without fail summon up a depressing cocktail of emotional extremes in me.
Tonight I want to examine exactly what I think of when I think about dead soldiers.
I am still in the process of reading Hannibal, and amidst Harris' new-found poetic bent, he wrote one editorial comment that struck me.
"Whether you believe in God or not, if you are a warrior Arlington is a sacred place, and the tragedy is not to die, but to be wasted."
The setting being Arlington National Cemetery across the river from Washington DC, as Agent Starling visits and contemplates the grave of a fallen comrade.
I have had the honor and privilege to walk amongst the snow white headstones of this cemetery, and to witness from afar a military funeral from the 21 gun salute to the folding and passing of the three-cornered American flag that draped the coffin of the fallen.
Under the privacy of my mirrored sunglasses, I cried as we watched the funeral progress. The tragedy is not to die, but to be wasted.
"[Starling] wondered how many like him had been wasted by stupidity and selfishness and the bargaining of tired old men."
That is the tragedy of war. That the leaders, the people the soldiers are supposed to respect and must trust with their lives, can and do send their wards into certain death, not for true glory or honor, but to make headlines or secure an economic asset to be exploited by the sugardaddies of the politicians at a later date.
Do not let my cynicism cause a misunderstanding. I am well aware that not all authority figures are corrupt or undeserving of respect or obedience. The battlefield can allow truly great tactical minds to shine, and can also allow the bravery and compassion of the good individual to shine through.
A beautiful thing about war and combat situations, I think, is that it presents an unforgiving proving ground to the individual warrior. That individual has a chance to make a decision in a very black and white environment, a decision that can be simplified in a way very few civilian decisions can be. The warrior can cower or desert, surrender and be at the mercy of his enemy, throw his life away without having blood on his hands, or fight and try to take the life of his counterpart on the other side of the battlefield. There are no politics involved. Only that warrior, his personal moral convictions, and his personal mental strengths and weaknesses. Some warriors break down instead of making a decision. War separates out the weak from the strong very quickly, but balances this fair judgement with the cold element of chaos found in the falling shrapnel of air-burst artillery shells.
War is beautiful because it gives the warrior a chance to stare down death's gaping maw and smirk fearlessly, in that moment proving his mettle to himself, giving him, regardless of whatever else happens, the hard-won knowledge of his own personal fortitude. War is worthless because that brave warrior can be cut down by chance. War is evil because it allows the privileged and powerful to send their brothers and countrymen, farmers and teachers, to an unavoidable, bloody and terrible, haunting and traumatizing fate.
When I see a veteran's grave, I always think of combat veterans, and I find myself jealous. I want a chance to stare down the maw of death and prove my mettle to myself. I naively think I am ready to suffer the permanent damage, the further loss of innocence that this entails. I am aware of my own mortality, but I have never really been close to death. Danger, yes. Treading water without a vest over a jagged coral reef as the Pacific Ocean repeatedly crashed over my head is probably the closest I've ever been to what I want, and I am proud of my thoughts and actions in that situation.
When I see a veteran's grave, I think of combat veterans being ordered to stare down the maw of death and test their mettle, whether they are personally ready or not. They signed the forms and were passed through the bureaucracy, and thus they are bound to oblige. That is not how this is supposed to work, and it is tragic. Eighteen year old children should not be ordered to eat, to dream of, to fixate on, to live with death; they should not be ordered to become the maw of death to be stared at by others.
The closest I think I can get to hopeless despair is when I try to immerse myself in the collective sorrow felt by those who are and those who should be physically present at a military funeral.
There will always be wars and rumors of wars, until the end of time. And modern warfare especially is a cold, dehumanized, detached and bureaucratic affair. War is honest when, as the warrior takes a life, he is haunted by the knowledge that the enemy he is killing is someone he must empathize with, someone who was born and raised by parents, someone who aspired to be a firefighter when he was young and innocent. War is honest when the warriors can look each other in the eye. I foresee war becoming less and less personal, less and less honest over the course of our lifetimes. I foresee war becoming more and more terrible.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
"The tragedy is not to die, but to be wasted."
A while back Angus and I walked through the graveyard in Erandique. It was one of those clear bright blue mountain days with a cool breeze and thankfully little dust. It seemed that every description and song I have read or heard about the "green fields of France" fit, trading poppies for a mooing cow. Except that there, in Erandique, the graves were shallow and unmarked. There were too many small mounds of earth and rock alongside a longer one, indicating a mother and child. I wouldn't have known that human beings were buried there if not for the wreathes of faded paper flowers. Towards the back of the cemetary, the mounds were smalled and more overgrown with grass, and eventually it melted into yet another cow pasture on the mountainside. I thought about lives spent scraping a living out of the dirt, only to wind up tilled back into it, and couldn't help thinking "for what?"
It that sounds heartless, it should, because those lives weren't mine, and so that question wasn't mine to ask.
I know what you mean about the perverse jealousy of people's more scarring experiences: veterans (and refugees, migrants, criminals, terrorists, crash survivors, ...) will have a differnt, possibly expanded, perspective on life. As for the romance of war, I think alot of it is propaganda. Everyone's got a life that's fizzling out, and so whatever you're doing with it is a risk. War just accelerates this for some people, and while it certainly is a venue for some bravery, there is also the courage to undertake a long grind toward some other goal. The question is, are you being wasted? You don't need a gun in your hand or a flag on your shoulder to answer that.
Salud, from Intibucá
Andy
Hi Alex,
This is Caroline - and obviously this is a really old entry, but I felt I wanted to make a comment.
I feel a lot of people see war as you do; feel the waste and see the tragedy. It is true that modern warfare is becoming more impersonal, I will give you that. And I think we are also becoming more cynical as a public as to the necessity of war or reasons for going to war; maybe rightly so. However, working with Veterans day in and day out and researching the trauma of war, and having my best friend as an enlisted Marine, I have to tell you I can't completely agree with your analysis.
#1. "Leaders...can and do send their wards into certain death, not for true glory or honor, but to make headlines or secure an economic asset."
I think this has been true across time and true in any human-human interaction, be it business or global conflict. I don't think 'true glory or honor' are any reason to send warriors to fight, either. I think here you forget why most warriors enter the battle field and many leaders send them: true belief.
I think in everything you say, there is glossing over about the ideals that these warriors are fighting for (e.g., you talk about war allowing great tactical minds to shine or warriors to prove themselves, but don't really mention defending deeply held beliefs/ideals). For example, when you discuss staring down death, etc., as a draw, I think, again, very few warriors, across time, have gone into battle mainly or solely for that reason. I would think finances play one of the bigger roles actually in drawing someone to enlistment and war; but aside from that and risk-seeking personalities - at the heart of many wars are simply truly and deeply held beliefs. Be they manipulated or not by higher ups.
#2. I very much disagree that war is as black or white as you make it seem for the warrior (and even if it was, there is hardly anything beautiful about being given such ultimatums). There is no environment more messy; many of the resulting trauma we see is because things are not black and white, and training is taking this into account. Furthermore, I don't think many warriors would say they are ever alone, the idea of brotherhood far eclipses that.
#3. Maybe they are 18 years old, maybe they sign a contract, and maybe there are high politicians pulling strings. But nothing is wasted unless personally considered a waste. Nothing is worthless. Simply put, when I die my life will be as much a waste as any of there's have been if I personally consider it as such. Anyone's life can be cut down by chance, not just in war - and thus, many life events can be as equally worthless.
If these brave men and women believe in their mission, in their job, and in their fight - no matter the political reason, the greed or the manipulations - there is no waste.
I think at most we can consider the need for war or reasons behind it the tragedy of the human condition. But as neither of us are actually warriors, I don't know if we can ever really sound off on this. You see, as Andy said, "those lives weren't mine, and so that question wasn't mine to ask." You can only define the worth and waste of your own life. No one else's.
Post a Comment